Audi A7 fuel consumption
Of all Audi A7 modifications produced from 2010 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 37% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 50% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 24% higher. Starting from 2010 Audi A7 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. Of course, it should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Audi A7 | All carmakers | Audi A7 | |
2010 | +16% | +50% | +16% | +30% |
Show all years | ||||
2011 | +19% | +50% | +19% | +30% |
2012 | +21% | +50% | +23% | +30% |
2013 | +23% | +50% | +27% | +30% |
2014 | +26% | +50% | +30% | +24% |
2015 | +27% | - | +33% | +18% |
2016 | +28% | - | +36% | +18% |
2017 | +28% | - | +38% | +18% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi A7.
2014 - 2017
Audi A7 2014 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.6 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.4 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +18% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 2.0 TFSI quattro 249 HP 4x4 automatic | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
2.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 2.8 FSI quattro 220 HP 4x4 automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 TFSI quattro 333 HP 4x4 automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
|
3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 TDI 218 HP automatic | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 TDI quattro 218 HP 4x4 automatic | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 TDI quattro 245 HP 4x4 automatic | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 TDI quattro 272 HP 4x4 automatic | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2014 Sportback 3.0 BiTDI quattro 320 HP 4x4 automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+18% |
2010 - 2014
Audi A7 2010 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +50% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +30% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A7 2010 2.8 FSI 204 HP 4x4 automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A7 2010 3.0 TFSI 300 HP 4x4 automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km+50% |
3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Audi A7 2010 3.0 TDI 204 HP automatic | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2011 3.0 TDI quattro 204 HP 4x4 automatic | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
|
Audi A7 2010 3.0 TDI 245 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+30% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.