Chevrolet Astro fuel consumption
Of all Chevrolet Astro modifications produced from 1985 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1995 Chevrolet Astro average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 1996 it was significantly higher than average, at 2001 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Astro | |||
| 1995 | +5% | +10% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1996 | +4% | +10% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +10% | ||
| 1998 | +3% | +10% | ||
| 1999 | +3% | +10% | ||
| 2000 | +4% | +10% | ||
| 2001 | +5% | +10% | ||
| 2002 | +6% | +10% | ||
| 2003 | +6% | +10% | ||
| 2004 | +7% | +10% | ||
| 2005 | +8% | +10% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Astro.
1995 - 2005
Chevrolet Astro 1995 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 18.8 MPG 12.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 17.0 MPG 13.8 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Astro 1995 4.3 190 HP automatic | 18.8 MPG 12.5 l/100km |
17.0 MPG 13.8 l/100km+10% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.