Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chrysler 300M fuel consumption

Of all Chrysler 300M modifications produced from 1998 to 2004 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 6% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1998 Chrysler 300M average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2002 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersChrysler 300M
1998+3%+7%
Show all years
1999+3%+7%
2000+4%+7%
2001+5%+7%
2002+6%+7%
2003+6%+7%
2004+7%+7%
1998 - 2004

Chrysler 300M 1998 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.9 MPG
11.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+6%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.7 liter petrol engine
Chrysler 300M 1998 2.7i V6 203 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km+7%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Chrysler 300M 1998 3.5i V6 254 HP automatic 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+6%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.