Chrysler Crossfire fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chrysler Crossfire | |||
| 2003 | +6% | +5% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2004 | +7% | +8% | ||
| 2005 | +8% | +8% | ||
| 2006 | +9% | +8% | ||
| 2007 | +11% | +5% | ||
| 2008 | +12% | +5% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chrysler Crossfire.
Chrysler Crossfire 2004 cabrio fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +8% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chrysler Crossfire 2004 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Chrysler Crossfire with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Chrysler Crossfire fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Chrysler Crossfire 2004 Roadster 3.2i V6 218 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Chrysler Crossfire with 3.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Chrysler Crossfire 2004 Roadster 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chrysler Crossfire 2004 Roadster 3.2i V6 218 HP manual | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+2% |
| Chrysler Crossfire 2004 Roadster 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP automatic | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km+8% |
| Chrysler Crossfire 2004 Roadster 3.2i V6 SRT-6 335 HP automatic | 21.4 MPG 11.0 l/100km |
18.8 MPG 12.5 l/100km+14% |
Chrysler Crossfire 2003 coupe fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.5 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 20.9 MPG 11.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +7% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chrysler Crossfire 2003 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Chrysler Crossfire with automatic transmission has nearly identical fuel consumption to the version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Chrysler Crossfire fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Chrysler Crossfire 2003 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Chrysler Crossfire with 3.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Chrysler Crossfire 2003 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chrysler Crossfire 2003 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP manual | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+2% |
| Chrysler Crossfire 2003 3.2i V6 Limited 218 HP automatic | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km+8% |
| Chrysler Crossfire 2005 3.2i V6 218 HP manual | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
21.4 MPG 11.0 l/100km+6% |
| Chrysler Crossfire 2004 3.2i V6 SRT-6 335 HP automatic | 21.4 MPG 11.0 l/100km |
18.8 MPG 12.5 l/100km+14% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.