Dacia Dokker fuel consumption
Of all Dacia Dokker modifications produced from 2012 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 25% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 21% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 30% higher. Starting from 2013 Dacia Dokker average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2016 it was similar to average, at 2017 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Dacia Dokker | All carmakers | Dacia Dokker | |
| 2013 | +23% | +14% | +27% | +24% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2014 | +26% | +14% | +30% | +24% |
| 2015 | +27% | +14% | +33% | +24% |
| 2016 | +28% | +27% | +36% | +35% |
| 2017 | +28% | +27% | +38% | +35% |
| 2018 | +28% | +27% | +39% | +35% |
| 2019 | +27% | +24% | +37% | +33% |
| 2020 | +27% | +24% | +36% | +33% |
| 2021 | +26% | +24% | +37% | +33% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Dacia Dokker.
2016
Dacia Dokker 2016 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.8 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +27% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 55.6 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 41.0 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +35% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.2 TCe 116 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+37% |
| 1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 TCe 102 Hp 102 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+27% |
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 TCe 131 Hp 131 HP manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+21% |
| 1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 dCi 75 Hp 75 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+40% |
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 dCi 90 Hp 90 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+33% |
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 Blue dCi 95 HP manual | 54.7 MPG 4.3 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+33% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.6 Sce 102 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+24% |
2012 - 2015
Dacia Dokker 2012 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 34.3 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +14% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +24% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.2 115 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+26% |
| 1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 dCi 75 Hp 75 HP manual | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
|
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 dCi 90 Hp 90 HP manual | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+24% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.6 85 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+1% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.