Dacia Logan fuel consumption
Of all Dacia Logan modifications produced from 2005 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 21% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 27% higher. Starting from 2005 Dacia Logan average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2006 it was similar to average, at 2017 difference became significantly higher than average and finally at 2019 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Dacia Logan | All carmakers | Dacia Logan | |
2005 | +8% | +6% | +10% | - |
Show all years | ||||
2006 | +9% | +6% | +11% | +13% |
2007 | +11% | +6% | +12% | +13% |
2008 | +12% | +9% | +13% | +21% |
2009 | +14% | +15% | +14% | +25% |
2010 | +16% | +15% | +16% | +25% |
2011 | +19% | +15% | +19% | +25% |
2012 | +21% | +20% | +23% | +29% |
2013 | +23% | +25% | +27% | +33% |
2014 | +26% | +25% | +30% | +33% |
2015 | +27% | +25% | +33% | +33% |
2016 | +28% | +32% | +36% | +35% |
2017 | +28% | +34% | +38% | +37% |
2018 | +28% | +34% | +39% | +37% |
2019 | +27% | +30% | +37% | +56% |
2020 | +27% | +30% | +36% | +56% |
Select Dacia Logan generation
For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.
Dacia Logan 2016 - 2020 sedan fuel economy Dacia Logan 2012 - 2016 sedan fuel economy Dacia Logan 2008 - 2012 sedan fuel economy Dacia Logan 2005 - 2008 sedan fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.