Dodge Avenger fuel consumption
Of all Dodge Avenger modifications produced from 2007 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 2007 the Dodge Avenger average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Dodge Avenger | |||
| 2007 | +11% | insignificant | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2008 | +12% | insignificant | ||
| 2009 | +14% | insignificant | ||
| 2010 | +16% | insignificant | ||
| 2011 | +19% | insignificant | ||
| 2012 | +21% | insignificant | ||
| 2013 | +23% | insignificant | ||
| 2014 | +26% | insignificant | ||
2007 - 2014
Dodge Avenger 2007 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.2 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Dodge Avenger 2007 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dodge Avenger 2007 2.0 156 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| Dodge Avenger 2007 2.0i 16V 156 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| 2.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Dodge Avenger 2007 2.4 170 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
|
| Dodge Avenger 2007 2.4 170 HP automatic | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+6% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.