Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Fiat 500 fuel consumption

Of all Fiat 500 modifications produced from 2007 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 34% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 21% higher. Starting from 2007 Fiat 500 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2011 it was significantly higher than average, at 2013 difference became slightly above industry average and finally at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. It should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersFiat 500
2007+11%+16%
Show all years
2008+12%+16%
2009+14%+16%
2010+16%+20%
2011+19%+27%
2012+21%+28%
2013+23%+28%
2014+26%+28%
2015+27%+37%
2016+28%+44%
2017+28%+44%
2018+28%+45%
2019+27%+45%
2020+27%+45%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat 500.

2015

Fiat 500 2015 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines49.9 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines38.4 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+45%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat 500 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Fiat 500 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Fiat 500 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 0.9 petrol engine and manual transmission (Fiat 500 2015 0.9 85 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat 500 with 0.9 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Fiat 500 2015 0.9 85 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
0.9 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2015 0.9 85 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+53%
Fiat 500 2015 0.9 85 HP automatic 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+61%
Fiat 500 2015 0.9 105 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+50%
1.2 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2015 1.2 69 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+32%
Fiat 500 2015 1.2 69 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+29%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2015 1.4 100 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Fiat 500 2015 1.4 100 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
2012

Fiat 500 2012 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines43.2 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+36%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines55.6 MPG
4.2 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat 500 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 5% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Fiat 500 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat 500 with 1.2 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Fiat 500 2013 1.2 L 1.3 MultiJet 85 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
0.9 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2012 0.9 L TwinAir Turbo 105 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+36%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat 500 2012 1.2 L 1.3 MultiJet 85 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Fiat 500 2013 1.2 L 1.3 MultiJet 85 HP automatic 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2012 L 1.4 95 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat 500 2012 L 1.6 MultiJet 105 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
2010 - 2015

Fiat 500 2010 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+28%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2010 1.2 69 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+28%
2007 - 2015

Fiat 500 2007 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines45.5 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines36.9 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+26%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+21%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
0.9 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2011 0.9 TWIN AIR 85 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+46%
1.2 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2007 1.2 69 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+22%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat 500 2010 1.2 1.3 Multijet 16V 75 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km+21%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat 500 2007 1.4 100 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.