Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Fiat Bravo fuel consumption

Of all Fiat Bravo modifications produced from 2007 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 19% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2007 Fiat Bravo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2008 it was less than industry average, at 2010 difference became significantly higher than average and finally at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersFiat BravoAll carmakersFiat Bravo
2007+11%+7% +12%+13%
Show all years
2008+12%+7% +13%+13%
2009+14%+7% +14%+13%
2010+16%+26% +16%+16%
2011+19%+31% +19%+23%
2012+21%+31% +23%+23%
2013+23%+31% +27%+23%
2014+26%+31% +30%+23%
2015+27%+31% +33%+23%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Bravo.

2010

Fiat Bravo 2010 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines40.8 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.7 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+31%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+23%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat Bravo 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Fiat Bravo advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Bravo with 1.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 120 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 90 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+8%
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+22%
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 140 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+32%
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 150 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
1.5 liter petrol engine
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.5 1.6 120 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+60%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 120 HP automatic 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 90 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 105 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+23%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Fiat Bravo 2010 2.0 165 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
2007 - 2010

Fiat Bravo 2007 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines43.2 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines38.2 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+13%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 16v 90 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+7%
Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 S 150 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
1.9 liter diesel engine
Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 115 120 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+11%
Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 150 150 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+14%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.