Fiat Bravo fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Fiat Bravo | All carmakers | Fiat Bravo | |
| 2007 | +11% | +7% | +12% | +13% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2008 | +12% | +7% | +13% | +13% |
| 2009 | +14% | +7% | +14% | +13% |
| 2010 | +16% | +26% | +16% | +16% |
| 2011 | +19% | +31% | +19% | +23% |
| 2012 | +21% | +31% | +23% | +23% |
| 2013 | +23% | +31% | +27% | +23% |
| 2014 | +26% | +31% | +30% | +23% |
| 2015 | +27% | +31% | +33% | +23% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Bravo.
Fiat Bravo 2010 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 40.8 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.7 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +31% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +23% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat Bravo 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Fiat Bravo advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Bravo with 1.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 120 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 90 HP manual | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+8% |
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP manual | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+22% |
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 140 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+32% |
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 150 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
|
| 1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.5 1.6 120 HP manual | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+60% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 120 HP automatic | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 90 HP manual | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 105 HP manual | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+23% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2010 2.0 165 HP manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
|
Fiat Bravo 2007 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +7% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.2 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 38.2 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +13% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 16v 90 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+7% |
| Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 S 150 HP automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
|
| 1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
| Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 115 120 HP manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+11% |
| Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 150 150 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+14% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.