Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Fiat Tipo fuel consumption

Of all Fiat Tipo modifications produced from 2016 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 34% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 40% higher. Starting from 2016 Fiat Tipo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2017 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersFiat TipoAll carmakersFiat Tipo
2016+28%+24% +36%+29%
Show all years
2017+28%+27% +38%+47%
2018+28%+27% +39%+47%
2019+27%+27% +37%+47%
2020+27%+27% +36%+47%
2021+26%+26% +37%+46%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Tipo.

2017

Fiat Tipo 2017 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines38.2 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+30%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.4 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+34%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Fiat Tipo 2017 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Fiat Tipo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Fiat Tipo advertised fuel economy is average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Tipo with 1.6 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.2d 95 HP manual 63.6 MPG
3.7 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+41%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.4 T-JET 120 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+35%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.4 95 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km0%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6 110 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+25%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP manual 63.6 MPG
3.7 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+49%
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP automatic 63.6 MPG
3.7 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+57%
2017

Fiat Tipo 2017 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.8 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines67.2 MPG
3.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+58%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Fiat Tipo 2017 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Fiat Tipo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Fiat Tipo advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Tipo with 1.6 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.2d 95 HP manual 63.6 MPG
3.7 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+41%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.4 95 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+21%
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.4 120 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+35%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6 110 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+25%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP manual 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+62%
Fiat Tipo 2017 1.6d 120 HP automatic 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+71%
2016

Fiat Tipo 2016 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.6 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+24%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.7 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines44.0 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+29%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.2 95 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+27%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.4 95 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+21%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.6 110 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+27%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.6 120 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+31%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.