Ford C-Max fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Ford C-Max | All carmakers | Ford C-Max | |
2003 | +6% | +15% | +8% | +16% |
Show all years | ||||
2004 | +7% | +16% | +9% | +16% |
2005 | +8% | +16% | +10% | +16% |
2006 | +9% | +16% | +11% | +16% |
2007 | +11% | +16% | +12% | +16% |
2008 | +12% | +17% | +13% | +16% |
2009 | +14% | +17% | +14% | +16% |
2010 | +16% | +22% | +16% | +21% |
2011 | +19% | +26% | +19% | +25% |
2012 | +21% | +26% | +23% | +25% |
2013 | +23% | +26% | +27% | +25% |
2014 | +26% | +32% | +30% | +33% |
2015 | +27% | +34% | +33% | +34% |
2016 | +28% | +34% | +36% | +38% |
2017 | +28% | +34% | +38% | +38% |
2018 | +28% | +34% | +39% | +38% |
2019 | +27% | +37% | +37% | +38% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford C-Max.
Ford C-Max 2014 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 39.1 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.2 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +34% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 54.0 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.1 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +38% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford C-Max 2014 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford C-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 11% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford C-Max advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford C-Max 2014 2.0 TDCi 150 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2014 1.0 EcoBoost 100 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+41% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.0 EcoBoost 125 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+39% |
1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 EcoBoost 150 HP manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+31% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 EcoBoost 150 HP automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km+43% |
Ford C-Max 2015 1.5 EcoBoost 182 HP automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km+38% |
1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 95 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+31% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 95 HP manual | 57.4 MPG 4.1 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+34% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 ECOnetic 105 HP manual | 61.9 MPG 3.8 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+42% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 120 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km+38% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 120 HP manual | 57.4 MPG 4.1 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+37% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 120 HP automatic | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+43% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.5 TDCi 120 HP automatic | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+28% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2015 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+17% |
Ford C-Max 2014 1.6 Ti-VCT 120 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+30% |
1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2014 1.6 TDCi 115 HP manual | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km+29% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2014 2.0 TDCi 150 HP manual | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+41% |
Ford C-Max 2014 2.0 TDCi 150 HP automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+46% |
Ford C-Max 2014 2.0 TDCi 170 HP automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+48% |
Ford C-Max 2010 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +26% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +25% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford C-Max 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford C-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 8% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford C-Max advertised fuel economy is average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford C-MAX 2010 2.0 TCDI 163 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2010 1.0 EcoBoost 100 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+43% |
Ford C-Max 2010 1.0 EcoBoost 125 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+41% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2010 1.6 105 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+14% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 1.6 125 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+12% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 1.6 150 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+21% |
1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2010 1.6 TCDI 95 HP manual | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+28% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 1.6 TCDI 115 HP manual | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+28% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2010 2.0 TCDI 115 HP automatic | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+18% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 2.0 TCDI 140 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+27% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 2.0 TCDI 140 HP automatic | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+25% |
Ford C-MAX 2010 2.0 TCDI 163 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+25% |
Ford C-Max 2007 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.0 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +17% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.2 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +16% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford C-Max 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 11% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford C-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford C-Max fuel economy is average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 TDCI 136 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford C-Max with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford C-MAX 2007 2.0 TDCi 136 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2007 1.6 16V 100 HP manual | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+14% |
1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2007 1.6 TDCi 90 HP manual | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+17% |
Ford C-MAX 2007 1.6 TDCi 109 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+16% |
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2007 1.8 16V 125 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+21% |
1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2007 1.8 TDCi 115 HP manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+15% |
Ford C-MAX 2007 1.8 16V 120 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+17% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+16% |
Ford C-MAX 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP automatic | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km+15% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2007 2.0 TDCi 136 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+14% |
Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 TDCI 136 HP automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
Ford C-Max 2003 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.5 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.9 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +16% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 38.2 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +15% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford C-Max 2003 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.9 liters per 100 km or 15% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford C-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 1 litres per 100 km or 15% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford C-Max advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford C-MAX 2003 2.0 TDCi 136 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford C-Max with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford C-MAX 2004 2.0 16V 145 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2003 1.6 16V 100 HP manual | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+17% |
Ford C-MAX 2004 1.6 16V Ti-VCT 114 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+20% |
1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2005 1.6 TDCi 90 HP | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
|
Ford C-MAX 2003 1.6 TDCi 109 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+16% |
Ford C-MAX 2003 1.6 TDCi 109 HP automatic | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+18% |
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2003 1.8 16V 120 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+14% |
1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-Max 2005 1.8 TDCi 115 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
|
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2003 2.0 16V 145 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+14% |
Ford C-MAX 2004 2.0 16V 145 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+16% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford C-MAX 2003 2.0 TDCi 136 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+13% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.