Ford S-Max fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Ford S-Max | All carmakers | Ford S-Max | |
2006 | +9% | +14% | +11% | +11% |
Show all years | ||||
2007 | +11% | +11% | +12% | +11% |
2008 | +12% | +11% | +13% | +11% |
2009 | +14% | +11% | +14% | +11% |
2010 | +16% | +18% | +16% | +21% |
2011 | +19% | +24% | +19% | +24% |
2012 | +21% | +24% | +23% | +24% |
2013 | +23% | +24% | +27% | +24% |
2014 | +26% | +24% | +30% | +24% |
2015 | +27% | +28% | +33% | +31% |
2016 | +28% | +36% | +36% | +37% |
2017 | +28% | +36% | +38% | +37% |
2018 | +28% | +36% | +39% | +37% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford S-Max.
Ford S-Max 2015 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +36% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.9 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 32.0 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +38% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford S-Max 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford S-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford S-Max advertised fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 180 Hp 180 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2015 1.5 160 HP manual | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+34% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 240 Hp 240 HP automatic | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km+38% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 150 Hp 150 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+42% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+35% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 4x4 150 Hp 150 HP manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+31% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 180 Hp 180 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+42% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 180 Hp Automatic 180 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+39% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 4x4 180 Hp Automatic 180 HP automatic | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+29% |
Ford S-MAX 2015 2.0 210 Hp 210 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+44% |
Ford S-Max 2010 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.1 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +24% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 40.1 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 32.4 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +24% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford S-Max 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford S-Max with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford S-Max fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 Hp 163 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2010 1.6 EcoBoost 160 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km+29% |
1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2010 1.6 TDCi 115 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+31% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 145 HP manual | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+16% |
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 EcoBoost 203 Hp 203 HP automatic | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km+25% |
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 EcoBoost 240 Hp 240 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km+25% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+21% |
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp Automatic 140 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+22% |
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 Hp 163 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+23% |
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 Hp Automatic 163 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2010 2.2 TDCi 200 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+23% |
Ford S-Max 2006 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +11% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 35.5 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 31.2 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +10% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford S-Max 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 2% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford S-Max fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford S-MAX 2007 2.3 16v 161 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford S-Max with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford S-MAX 2006 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-Max 2006 1.8 TDCi 125 Hp 125 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
|
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2006 2.0 16v 145 HP manual | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+16% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2007 2.0 TDCi 130 Hp 130 HP automatic | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+10% |
Ford S-MAX 2006 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+11% |
2.2 liter diesel engine | ||
Ford S-Max 2006 2.2 TDCi 175 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
|
2.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-Max 2006 2.3 T 161 HP manual | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
|
Ford S-MAX 2007 2.3 16v 161 HP automatic | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km+6% |
2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Ford S-MAX 2006 2.5 20v Turbo 220 HP manual | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+12% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.