Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Hyundai Kona fuel consumption

Of all Hyundai Kona modifications produced from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 16% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 38% higher. Since 2017 the Hyundai Kona average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersHyundai KonaAll carmakersHyundai Kona
2017+28%+17% +38%-
Show all years
2018+28%+17% +39%+38%
2019+27%+17% +37%+38%
2020+27%+17% +36%+38%
2021+26%+17% +37%+38%
2017

Hyundai Kona 2017 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+16%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+38%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Kona 2017 1.0 120 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+23%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Kona 2017 1.6 T-GDI 177 HP 4x4 automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+10%
Hyundai Kona 2017 1.6 T-GDI 177 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Kona 2018 1.6 CRDi 116 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+38%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.