Jeep Commander fuel consumption
Of all Jeep Commander modifications produced from 2006 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2006 Jeep Commander average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Jeep Commander | |||
| 2006 | +11% | +13% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2007 | +12% | +13% | ||
| 2008 | +13% | +13% | ||
| 2009 | +14% | +13% | ||
| 2010 | +16% | +13% | ||
2006 - 2010
Jeep Commander 2006 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 16.4 MPG 14.4 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 19.3 MPG 12.2 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +13% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 CRD 218 HP 4x4 automatic | 21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km |
19.3 MPG 12.2 l/100km+13% |
| 3.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.7 i V6 2WD 213 HP automatic | 17.7 MPG 13.3 l/100km |
|
| 4.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| Jeep Commander 2006 4.7i V8 231 HP 4x4 automatic | 15.9 MPG 14.8 l/100km |
|
| Jeep Commander 2006 4.7 303 HP 4x4 automatic | 16.9 MPG 13.9 l/100km |
|
| 5.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| Jeep Commander 2006 5.7i HEMI V8 326 HP 4x4 automatic | 15.2 MPG 15.5 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.