Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Kia Pride fuel consumption

Of all Kia Pride modifications produced from 1991 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 1995 the Kia Pride average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersKia Pride
1995+5%insignificant
Show all years
1996+4%insignificant
1997+3%insignificant
1998+3%insignificant
1999+3%insignificant
2000+4%insignificant
1991 - 2000

Kia Pride 1991 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines32.0 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Pride 1991 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Pride with 1.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Pride 1995 1.3 64 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Kia Pride 1991 1.1 i 52 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
1.3 liter petrol engine
Kia Pride 1995 1.3 64 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+7%
Kia Pride 1996 1.3 64 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Kia Pride 1991 1.3i 73 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Kia Pride 1991 1.3i 73 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.