Kia Pride fuel consumption
Of all Kia Pride modifications produced from 1991 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 1995 the Kia Pride average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Kia Pride | |||
1995 | +5% | insignificant | ||
Show all years | ||||
1996 | +4% | insignificant | ||
1997 | +3% | insignificant | ||
1998 | +3% | insignificant | ||
1999 | +3% | insignificant | ||
2000 | +4% | insignificant |
1991 - 2000
Kia Pride 1991 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.0 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Pride 1991 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Pride with 1.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Pride 1995 1.3 64 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.1 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Pride 1991 1.1 i 52 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
|
1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Pride 1995 1.3 64 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+7% |
Kia Pride 1996 1.3 64 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
Kia Pride 1991 1.3i 73 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
|
Kia Pride 1991 1.3i 73 HP automatic | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.