Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Kia RIO fuel consumption

Of all Kia RIO modifications produced from 1999 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 30% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 22% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 38% higher. Starting from 2000 Kia RIO average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2018 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. It should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersKia RIOAll carmakersKia RIO
2000+4%+13% +5%-
Show all years
2001+5%+13% +6%-
2002+6%+13% +7%-
2003+6%+11% +8%-
2004+7%+8% +9%-
2005+8%+13% +10%+23%
2006+9%+20% +11%+23%
2007+11%+22% +12%+23%
2008+12%+24% +13%+23%
2009+14%+26% +14%+23%
2010+16%+28% +16%-
2011+19%+32% +19%+43%
2012+21%+35% +23%+43%
2013+23%+35% +27%+43%
2014+26%+35% +30%+43%
2015+27%+33% +33%+41%
2016+28%+31% +36%+38%
2017+28%+26% +38%+38%
2018+28%+17% +39%-
2019+27%+17% +37%-
2020+27%+22% +36%-
2021+26%+24% +37%-

Select Kia RIO generation

For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.

Kia RIO 2020 hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2017 - 2020 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2015 - 2017 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2011 - 2015 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2009 - 2011 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2005 - 2009 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2003 - 2005 hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 2000 - 2003 sedan, hatchback fuel economy Kia RIO 1999 - 2003 sedan fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.