Kia Shuma fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Kia Shuma | |||
1998 | +3% | +19% | ||
Show all years | ||||
1999 | +3% | +19% | ||
2000 | +4% | +19% | ||
2001 | +5% | +9% | ||
2002 | +6% | insignificant | ||
2003 | +6% | insignificant | ||
2004 | +7% | insignificant |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Kia Shuma.
Kia Shuma 2001 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Shuma 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 7% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Shuma with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Shuma 2001 1.6 101 HP), but despite this 85% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Shuma 2001 1.6 101 HP manual | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km-1% |
Kia Shuma 2001 1.6 101 HP automatic | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Shuma 2001 1.8i 114 HP manual | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km-3% |
Kia Shuma 2001 1.8i 114 HP automatic | 24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
Kia Shuma 1998 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.6 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +19% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Shuma 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Kia Shuma advertised fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Shuma with 1.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Shuma 1998 1.5 88 HP), but despite this 70% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Shuma 1998 1.5 88 HP manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+19% |
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Kia Shuma 1998 1.8 111 HP manual | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
|
Kia Shuma 1998 1.8 111 HP automatic | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.