Land Rover Range Rover Velar fuel consumption
Of all Land Rover Range Rover Velar modifications produced from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2017 the Land Rover Range Rover Velar average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Land Rover Range Rover Velar | |||
| 2017 | +38% | +26% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2018 | +39% | +26% | ||
| 2019 | +37% | +26% | ||
| 2020 | +36% | +26% | ||
| 2021 | +37% | +26% | ||
2017
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 40.1 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +27% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 P250 250 HP 4x4 automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 D180 180 HP 4x4 automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+37% |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 D240 S 240 HP 4x4 automatic | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+22% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 3.0 P380 380 HP 4x4 automatic | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 3.0 D300 300 HP 4x4 automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+20% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.