Nissan Evalia (NV200) fuel consumption
Of all Nissan Evalia (NV200) modifications produced from 2011 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2011 the Nissan Evalia (NV200) average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Nissan Evalia (NV200) | All carmakers | Nissan Evalia (NV200) | |
2011 | +19% | +15% | +19% | +14% |
Show all years | ||||
2012 | +21% | +15% | +23% | +14% |
2013 | +23% | +15% | +27% | +14% |
2014 | +26% | +15% | +30% | +14% |
2015 | +26% | +15% | +33% | +14% |
2016 | +28% | +15% | +36% | +14% |
2011
Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +15% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 38.2 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +14% |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 specs
Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 owner reviewsNissan Evalia (NV200) service info and schedule
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Nissan Evalia 1.5 dCi 90 HP manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km+15% |
Nissan Evalia 1.5 dCi 110 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+13% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Evalia 1.6 110 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+15% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.