Nissan Note fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Nissan Note | All carmakers | Nissan Note | |
2005 | +8% | +8% | +10% | +6% |
Show all years | ||||
2006 | +9% | +8% | +11% | +6% |
2007 | +11% | +8% | +12% | +6% |
2008 | +12% | +8% | +13% | +6% |
2009 | +14% | +9% | +14% | +6% |
2010 | +16% | +11% | +16% | +17% |
2011 | +19% | +11% | +19% | +17% |
2012 | +21% | +24% | +23% | +25% |
2013 | +23% | +24% | +27% | +33% |
2014 | +26% | +36% | +30% | +33% |
2015 | +27% | +36% | +33% | +33% |
2016 | +28% | +36% | +36% | +33% |
2017 | +28% | +36% | +38% | +33% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Note.
Nissan Note 2012 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 53.2 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +37% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 65.3 MPG 3.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +33% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan Note 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 19% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Nissan Note with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Nissan Note advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan Note 2013 1.2 80 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Nissan Note with 1.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan Note 2013 1.5 dCi 90 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2013 1.2 80 HP manual | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km+23% |
Nissan Note 2012 1.2 DIG-S 98 HP manual | 54.7 MPG 4.3 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+51% |
Nissan Note 2012 1.2 DIG-S 98 HP automatic | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+35% |
1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2013 1.5 dCi 90 HP manual | 65.3 MPG 3.6 l/100km |
|
1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Nissan Note 2012 1.5 dCi 90 HP manual | 65.3 MPG 3.6 l/100km |
49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km+33% |
Nissan Note 2009 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 36.6 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.8 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +11% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 50.6 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +17% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan Note 2009 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Nissan Note with automatic transmission consumes around 2.1 litres per 100 km or 32% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan Note 2009 1.6 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2009 1.4 88 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+8% |
1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Nissan Note 2010 1.5 dCi 90 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km+17% |
Nissan Note 2009 1.5 dCi 106 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2009 1.6 110 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km-2% |
Nissan Note 2009 1.6 110 HP automatic | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+26% |
Nissan Note 2005 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.5 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.8 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +8% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 45.7 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan Note 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Nissan Note with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 18% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan Note 2005 1.6 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2005 1.4 88 HP manual | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+6% |
1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Nissan Note 2005 1.5 dCi lp 68 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
Nissan Note 2005 1.5 dCi hp 86 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+6% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Nissan Note 2005 1.6 110 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+3% |
Nissan Note 2005 1.6 110 HP automatic | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+14% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.