Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Peugeot 108 fuel consumption

Of all Peugeot 108 modifications produced from 2014 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 36% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2014 the Peugeot 108 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersPeugeot 108
2014+26%+36%
Show all years
2015+27%+36%
2016+28%+36%
2017+28%+36%
2018+28%+36%
2014

Peugeot 108 2014 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines42.3 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+36%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 108 2014 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 11% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 108 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 8% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Peugeot 108 fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 108 2014 1.0 68 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 108 2014 1.0 68 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+37%
Peugeot 108 2014 1.0 68 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+33%
1.2 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 108 2014 1.2 82 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+37%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.