Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Renault Espace 2002 fuel consumption

Renault Espace from 2002 to 2006 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 8% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 6% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 10% higher. Starting from 2002 Renault Espace average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2003 it was slightly above industry average, at 2006 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersRenault EspaceAll carmakersRenault Espace
2002+6%+17% +7%+9%
Show all years
2003+6%+11% +8%+9%
2004+7%+11% +9%+9%
2005+8%+11% +10%+9%
2006+9%+21% +11%+9%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Renault Espace.

2002 - 2006

Renault Espace 2002 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.7 MPG
10.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines28.6 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+9%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Renault Espace 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1 liters per 100 km or 11% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Renault Espace with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Renault Espace fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Renault Espace 2002 2.0 Turbo 16V 165 Hp 165 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Renault Espace with 3.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Renault Espace 2002 3.5 V6 24V 245 HP), but despite this 75% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.9 liter diesel engine
Renault Espace 2002 1.9 DCi 16V 120 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+6%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Renault Espace 2002 2.0 16V 140 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Renault Espace 2002 2.0 Turbo 16V 165 Hp 165 HP manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+1%
Renault Espace 2003 2.0 Turbo 16V 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km-1%
Renault Espace 2005 2.0 Turbo 16V 170 Hp 170 HP manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+10%
Renault Espace 2005 2.0 Turbo 16V 170 Hp Automatic 170 HP automatic 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km+5%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Renault Espace 2002 2.2 DCi 16V 150 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+6%
Renault Espace 2003 2.2 DCi 16V Automatic 150 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+9%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Renault Espace 2002 3.0 DCi V6 24V 180 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+15%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Renault Espace 2002 3.5 V6 24V 245 HP automatic 19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km
14.6 MPG
16.1 l/100km+32%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.