Renault Scenic fuel consumption
Of all Renault Scenic modifications produced from 2001 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Starting from 2001 Renault Scenic average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2007 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Renault Scenic | All carmakers | Renault Scenic | |
| 2001 | +5% | +15% | +6% | +12% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2002 | +6% | +13% | +7% | +12% |
| 2003 | +6% | +13% | +8% | +15% |
| 2004 | +7% | +12% | +9% | +17% |
| 2005 | +8% | +12% | +10% | +14% |
| 2006 | +9% | +9% | +11% | +11% |
| 2007 | +11% | +6% | +12% | +12% |
| 2008 | +12% | +6% | +13% | +12% |
| 2009 | +14% | +12% | +14% | +13% |
| 2010 | +16% | +21% | +16% | +15% |
| 2011 | +19% | +21% | +19% | +15% |
| 2012 | +21% | +20% | +23% | +26% |
| 2013 | +23% | +19% | +27% | +37% |
| 2014 | +26% | +19% | +30% | +37% |
| 2015 | +27% | +19% | +33% | +37% |
| 2016 | +28% | +19% | +36% | +37% |
Select Renault Scenic generation
For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.
Renault Scenic 2012 - 2016 fuel economy Renault Scenic 2009 - 2012 fuel economy Renault Scenic 2006 - 2009 fuel economy Renault Scenic 2003 - 2006 fuel economy Renault Scenic 2001 - 2003 fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.