Rover 200 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Rover 200 | All carmakers | Rover 200 | |
| 1992 | +5% | +8% | +2% | - |
| Show all years | ||||
| 1993 | +5% | +8% | +3% | - |
| 1994 | +6% | +8% | +3% | - |
| 1995 | +5% | +10% | +2% | - |
| 1996 | +4% | +12% | +2% | - |
| 1997 | +3% | +11% | +3% | - |
| 1998 | +3% | +12% | +4% | +7% |
| 1999 | +3% | +12% | +5% | +7% |
| 2000 | +4% | +9% | +5% | - |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Rover 200.
Rover 200 1995 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 33.2 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.3 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +16% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +7% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Rover 200 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Rover 200 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 200 1995 1.8 200 Vi 145 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 214i 75 Hp 75 HP manual | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+18% |
| Rover 214i 103 Hp 103 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+14% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 216i 112 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+15% |
| Rover 216i CVT 112 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| 1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 200 1995 1.8 200 Vi 145 HP manual | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+18% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Rover 220 D 86 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
| Rover 220 TDic 105 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+7% |
Rover 200 1992 cabrio fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.9 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +5% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 214 Cabriolet 103 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+8% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 216 Cabriolet 122 HP manual | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+1% |
Rover 200 1990 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 33.8 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Rover 200 1990 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Rover 200 fuel economy is significantly above average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Rover 200 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 200 1993 2.0 220 Turbo 200 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 214 75 Hp 75 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+14% |
| Rover 214 92 Hp 92 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
|
| Rover 214 103 Hp 103 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km-1% |
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 216 112 HP manual | 27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km |
|
| Rover 216 Automatic 112 HP automatic | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
|
| 1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Rover 218 D Turbo 88 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Rover 200 1993 2.0 220 GTi 136 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| Rover 200 1993 2.0 220 Turbo 200 HP manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.