Suzuki Baleno fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Suzuki Baleno | |||
1995 | +5% | insignificant | ||
Show all years | ||||
1996 | +4% | insignificant | ||
1997 | +3% | insignificant | ||
1998 | +3% | +4% | ||
1999 | +3% | +4% | ||
2000 | +4% | +4% | ||
2001 | +5% | +4% | ||
2002 | +6% | insignificant | ||
2016 | +28% | +24% | ||
2017 | +28% | +24% | ||
2018 | +28% | +24% | ||
2019 | +27% | +24% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Suzuki Baleno.
Suzuki Baleno 2016 hatchback fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 42.5 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +24% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Baleno 2016 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Suzuki Baleno with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Baleno with 1.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Suzuki Baleno 2016 1.2 90 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 2016 1.0 112 HP manual | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+27% |
Suzuki Baleno 2016 1.0 112 HP automatic | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+28% |
1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 2016 1.2 90 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km+17% |
Suzuki Baleno 2016 1.2 90 HP automatic | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
Suzuki Baleno 1998 hatchback fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.6 96 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+3% |
Suzuki Baleno 1998 sedan fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +7% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Baleno 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.5 liters per 100 km or 19% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.6 96 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Baleno with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.8 121 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.3 85 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+11% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.6 96 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+3% |
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.6 96 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.8 121 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+8% |
Suzuki Baleno 1998 1.8 121 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1999 1.9 TD 75 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
Suzuki Baleno 1995 wagon fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.5 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.6 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Baleno 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.4 liters per 100 km or 18% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.6 96 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Baleno with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.8 121 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.3 85 HP manual | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+1% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1995 1.6 96 HP 4x4 manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+3% |
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.6 96 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km-1% |
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.6 96 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.8 121 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+4% |
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.8 121 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Suzuki Baleno 1995 Wagon 1.9 TD 75 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.