Suzuki Liana fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Suzuki Liana | |||
| 2001 | +5% | +8% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2002 | +6% | +10% | ||
| 2003 | +6% | +10% | ||
| 2004 | +7% | +9% | ||
| 2005 | +8% | +8% | ||
| 2006 | +9% | +8% | ||
| 2007 | +11% | +8% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Suzuki Liana.
Suzuki Liana 2004 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +7% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Liana 2004 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.1 liters per 100 km or 16% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Suzuki Liana with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Suzuki Liana fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Liana with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter diesel engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.4 Diesel 90 HP manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP manual | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+10% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP automatic | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+17% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4 manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+3% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4 automatic | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km-2% |
Suzuki Liana 2004 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +9% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Liana 2004 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Suzuki Liana with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Suzuki Liana fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Liana with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter diesel engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.4 Diesel 90 HP manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP manual | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+10% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 106 HP automatic | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+17% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4 manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+3% |
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6i 107 HP 4x4 automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+7% |
Suzuki Liana 2001 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.1 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +9% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Liana 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Suzuki Liana fuel economy is slightly worse than average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Liana with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 103 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.3 90 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.3 i 16V 2WD 90 HP automatic | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 103 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+11% |
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 103 HP automatic | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
|
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 i 16V 103 HP 4x4 manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+7% |
| Suzuki Liana 2003 Sport 1.6 i 16V 106 HP 4x4 automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
|
Suzuki Liana 2001 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.9 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Liana 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Suzuki Liana fuel economy is slightly worse than average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Suzuki Liana with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 103 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.3 i 16V GL 90 HP manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 GLX 1.6 i 16V 103 HP 4x4 manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+7% |
| Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 103 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+13% |
| Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 103 HP automatic | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.