Toyota Auris fuel consumption
Of all Toyota Auris modifications produced from 2007 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 25% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2007 Toyota Auris average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2008 it was less than industry average, at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Toyota Auris | All carmakers | Toyota Auris | |
| 2007 | +11% | +10% | +12% | +11% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2008 | +12% | +10% | +13% | +11% |
| 2009 | +14% | +11% | +14% | +11% |
| 2010 | +16% | +14% | +16% | +12% |
| 2011 | +19% | +20% | +19% | +16% |
| 2012 | +21% | +20% | +23% | +16% |
| 2013 | +23% | +26% | +27% | +26% |
| 2014 | +26% | +33% | +30% | +35% |
| 2015 | +27% | +28% | +33% | +39% |
| 2016 | +28% | +26% | +36% | +41% |
| 2017 | +28% | +26% | +38% | +41% |
| 2018 | +28% | +26% | +39% | +41% |
| 2019 | +27% | +26% | +37% | +41% |
| 2020 | +27% | +26% | +36% | +41% |
Select Toyota Auris generation
For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.
Toyota Auris 2015 hatchback fuel economy Toyota Auris 2013 - 2015 wagon, hatchback fuel economy Toyota Auris 2010 - 2013 wagon, hatchback fuel economy Toyota Auris 2007 - 2010 hatchback fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.