Toyota Urban Cruiser fuel consumption
Of all Toyota Urban Cruiser modifications produced from 2008 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2008 Toyota Urban Cruiser average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2010 it was similar to average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Toyota Urban Cruiser | |||
| 2008 | +12% | +16% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2009 | +14% | +16% | ||
| 2010 | +16% | +16% | ||
| 2011 | +19% | +16% | ||
| 2012 | +21% | +16% | ||
| 2013 | +23% | +16% | ||
| 2014 | +26% | +16% | ||
2008 - 2014
Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 43.9 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +16% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 100 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+16% |
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.4 90 HP manual | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
|
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.4 AWD 90 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
|
| 1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 AWD 103 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
|
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 109 HP automatic | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.