Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Toyota Verso fuel consumption

Of all Toyota Verso modifications produced from 2009 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 17% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 14% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Starting from 2009 Toyota Verso average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersToyota VersoAll carmakersToyota Verso
2009+14%+14% +14%+14%
Show all years
2010+16%+14% +16%+15%
2011+19%+14% +19%+15%
2012+21%+14% +23%+15%
2013+23%+14% +27%+18%
2014+26%+15% +30%+24%
2015+27%+15% +33%+24%
2016+28%+14% +36%+24%
2017+28%+14% +38%+24%
2018+28%+14% +39%+24%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Toyota Verso.

2013 - 2018

Toyota Verso 2013 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.9 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+14%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines46.3 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+24%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Toyota Verso 2013 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Verso with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 D 126 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Toyota Verso with 1.8 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Toyota Verso 2013 1.8 147 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 132 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+12%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2014 1.6 D-4D 112 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Toyota Verso 2014 1.6 D-4D 112 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Toyota Verso 2013 1.8 147 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+13%
Toyota Verso 2013 1.8 147 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+18%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 D 126 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+24%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2013 2.2 DCAT 150 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
2010 - 2015

Toyota Verso 2010 Verso-S fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+15%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines54.1 MPG
4.4 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Toyota Verso 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Toyota Verso with 1.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Toyota Verso 2010 -S 1.3 99 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Toyota Verso 2010 -S 1.3 99 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+15%
Toyota Verso 2010 -S 1.3 99 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
1.4 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2010 1.4 D-4D DPF 89 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Toyota Verso 2010 1.4 D-4D DPF 89 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
2009 - 2013

Toyota Verso 2009 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.3 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.0 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+14%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.7 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.9 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+15%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Toyota Verso 2009 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Verso with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Toyota Verso fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Toyota Verso 2009 1.8 147 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Toyota Verso 2009 1.6 132 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+15%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Toyota Verso 2009 1.8 147 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+13%
Toyota Verso 2009 1.8 147 HP automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 D-4D-F 126 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+14%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Toyota Verso 2009 2.2 D-4D 150 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Toyota Verso 2010 2.2 D-4D-F D-CAT 150 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+16%
Toyota Verso 2009 2.2 D-CAT 177 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Toyota Verso 2009 2.2 D-CAT 177 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.