Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Fox fuel consumption

Of all Volkswagen Fox modifications produced from 2005 to 2011 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 5% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 8% higher, but for diesel engines is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption. Since 2005 the Volkswagen Fox average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen FoxAll carmakersVolkswagen Fox
2005+8%+8% +10%insignificant
Show all years
2006+9%+8% +11%insignificant
2007+11%+8% +12%insignificant
2008+12%+8% +13%insignificant
2009+14%+8% +14%insignificant
2010+16%+8% +16%insignificant
2011+19%+8% +19%insignificant
2005 - 2011

Volkswagen Fox 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.0 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines34.3 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Fox 2005 1.2 55 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+13%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Fox 2005 1.4 75 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+3%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Fox 2005 1.4 TDI 70 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+2%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.