Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volvo S70 fuel consumption

Of all Volvo S70 modifications produced from 1996 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1997 Volvo S70 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2000 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolvo S70All carmakersVolvo S70
1997+3%insignificant+3%insignificant
Show all years
1998+3%insignificant+4%insignificant
1999+3%insignificant+5%insignificant
2000+4%-+5%+3%
1996 - 2000

Volvo S70 1996 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.5 MPG
10.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.2 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines33.5 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volvo S70 1996 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volvo S70 1997 2.3 T-5 241 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo S70 with 2.5 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volvo S70 1999 2.5 D 140 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo S70 1997 2.0 126 HP manual 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.0 126 HP automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+8%
Volvo S70 1996 2.0 T 20 V 180 HP manual 20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km
Volvo S70 1996 2.0 T 20 V 180 HP automatic 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km
Volvo S70 1996 2.0 20V Turbo 226 HP manual 21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km
Volvo S70 1996 2.0 20V Turbo 226 HP automatic 20.3 MPG
11.6 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Volvo S70 1997 2.3 R 240 HP automatic 21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.3 T-5 240 HP manual 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.3 T-5 240 HP automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.3 T-5 241 HP manual 21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km-4%
Volvo S70 1997 2.3 T-5 241 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.3 R 250 HP manual 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
2.4 liter petrol engine
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 140 HP manual 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 140 HP automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 144 HP manual 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km0%
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 144 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 20V 170 HP manual 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km-2%
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 20V 170 HP automatic 21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 170 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 170 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 T 193 HP manual 21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
Volvo S70 1997 2.4 2.5 T 193 HP automatic 21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km
19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km+6%
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 T 193 HP manual 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 T 193 HP automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 T AWD 193 HP manual 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Volvo S70 1999 2.4 T AWD 193 HP automatic 20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km
2.5 liter diesel engine
Volvo S70 1997 TDI 2.5 140 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+5%
Volvo S70 1997 TDI 2.5 140 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+6%
Volvo S70 1999 2.5 D 140 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+3%
Volvo S70 1999 2.5 D 140 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.