Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volvo V60 fuel consumption

Of all Volvo V60 modifications produced from 2010 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 28% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 25% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 31% higher. Starting from 2010 Volvo V60 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2012 it was less than industry average, at 2016 difference became similar to average and finally at 2019 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolvo V60All carmakersVolvo V60
2010+16%+15% +16%+20%
Show all years
2011+19%+15% +19%+23%
2012+21%+15% +23%+23%
2013+23%+16% +27%+30%
2014+26%+13% +30%+35%
2015+27%+13% +33%+39%
2016+28%+29% +36%+38%
2017+28%+29% +38%+38%
2018+28%+32% +39%+37%
2019+27%+36% +37%+32%
2020+27%+36% +36%+32%
2021+26%-+37%+32%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volvo V60.

2018

Volvo V60 2018 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines33.4 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+36%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines52.6 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+32%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volvo V60 2018 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo V60 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.1 litres per 100 km or 22% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Volvo V60 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volvo V60 2018 2.0 D3 150 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo V60 with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volvo V60 2018 2.0 T5 249 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 T5 249 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+35%
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 T6 AWD 310 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km+37%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 D3 150 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+16%
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 D3 150 HP automatic 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+33%
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 D4 190 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Volvo V60 2018 2.0 D4 190 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+47%
2013 - 2018

Volvo V60 2013 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.8 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.4 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+23%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines52.0 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines37.6 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+39%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volvo V60 2013 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 12% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo V60 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volvo V60 fuel economy is average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.4 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Volvo V60 2013 2.4 D5 AWD 215 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo V60 with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D4 181 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2016 1.5 T2 122 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 T3 150 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+23%
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 T3 150 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+11%
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 T4 180 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 T4 180 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 D2 115 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+27%
Volvo V60 2013 1.6 D2 115 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+45%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 T5 240 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 T6 306 HP automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Volvo V60 2016 Polestar 2.0 T6 367 HP 4x4 automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km+54%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D2 120 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+47%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D2 120 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+40%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D3 136 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+33%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D3 136 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+31%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D3 150 HP manual 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+50%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D3 150 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+52%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D4 163 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+38%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D4 163 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+29%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D4 181 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+56%
Volvo V60 2013 2.0 D4 181 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+51%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D4 190 HP manual 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+38%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D4 190 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+50%
Volvo V60 2015 2.0 D5 225 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+46%
2.4 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2013 2.4 D5 215 HP manual 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+41%
Volvo V60 2013 2.4 D5 215 HP automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+18%
Volvo V60 2013 2.4 D5 AWD 215 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+17%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2013 3.0 T6 AWD 304 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Volvo V60 2014 Polestar 3.0 T6 350 HP 4x4 automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+4%
2010 - 2013

Volvo V60 2010 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.2 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+15%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.8 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines34.2 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+23%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volvo V60 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo V60 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volvo V60 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.4 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volvo V60 2010 2.4 D5 205 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo V60 with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volvo V60 2010 2.0 D3 163 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2010 1.6 T3 150 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+19%
Volvo V60 2010 1.6 T4 180 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+11%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2011 1.6 Drive 115 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+33%
Volvo V60 2011 1.6 Drive 115 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+33%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2010 2.0T 203 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Volvo V60 2010 2.0T 203 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Volvo V60 2011 2.0 T5 240 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Volvo V60 2011 2.0 T5 240 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2010 2.0 D3 163 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+18%
Volvo V60 2010 2.0 D3 163 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+16%
Volvo V60 2012 2.0 D3 163 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+19%
2.4 liter diesel engine
Volvo V60 2010 2.4 D5 AWD 205 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+17%
Volvo V60 2010 2.4 D5 205 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+31%
Volvo V60 2010 2.4 D5 205 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+16%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo V60 2010 3.0 T6 AWD 304 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
20.3 MPG
11.6 l/100km+14%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.