Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Alfa Romeo 156 2000 fuel consumption

Alfa Romeo 156 from 2000 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 5% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2003 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAlfa Romeo 156All carmakersAlfa Romeo 156
2000+4%+7% +5%insignificant
Show all years
2001+5%+7% +6%insignificant
2002+6%+7% +7%insignificant
2003+6%+14% +8%-

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Alfa Romeo 156.

2000 - 2003

Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+6%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.2 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines37.2 MPG
6.3 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, Alfa Romeo 156 2000 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Alfa Romeo 156 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Alfa Romeo 156 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.4 diesel engine and manual transmission (Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.4 JTD 140 Hp 140 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Alfa Romeo 156 with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.0 T.Spark 16V Selespeed 155 Hp Automatic 155 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 1.6 T.Spark 16V 120 HP manual 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+10%
1.7 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 1.7 Sportwagon 1.8 T.Spark 16V 140 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+4%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 1.7 T.Spark 16V 144 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+5%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 1.9 JTD 105 Hp 105 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km-2%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 1.9 JTD 110 Hp 110 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km0%
Alfa Romeo 156 2001 Sportwagon 1.9 JTD 115 Hp 115 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km0%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.0 T.Spark 16V 150 Hp 150 HP manual 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+17%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.0 T.Spark 16V Selespeed 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.0 T.Spark 16V 155 Hp 155 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km+14%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.0 T.Spark 16V Selespeed 155 Hp Automatic 155 HP automatic 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
2.4 liter diesel engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.4 JTD 136 Hp 136 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+4%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.4 JTD 140 Hp 140 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+7%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.5 V6 24V 190 HP manual 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km
19.0 MPG
12.4 l/100km+6%
Alfa Romeo 156 2000 Sportwagon 2.5 V6 24V Q-System 190 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km-2%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.