Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 fuel consumption
Alfa Romeo Spider from 1995 to 1998 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 25% higher. Since 1995 the Alfa Romeo Spider average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Alfa Romeo Spider | |||
| 1995 | +5% | insignificant | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1996 | +4% | insignificant | ||
| 1997 | +3% | insignificant | ||
| 1998 | +3% | insignificant | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Alfa Romeo Spider.
1995 - 1998
Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 2.0 Twin Spark 16V 150 HP manual | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km-2% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 3.0 V6 192 HP manual | 21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km |
19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km+6% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.