Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Alfa Romeo Spider 1998 fuel consumption

Alfa Romeo Spider from 1998 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 25% higher. Since 1998 the Alfa Romeo Spider average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersAlfa Romeo Spider
1998+3%insignificant
Show all years
1999+3%insignificant
2000+4%insignificant
2001+5%insignificant
2002+6%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Alfa Romeo Spider.

1998 - 2003

Alfa Romeo Spider 1998 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.2 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.7 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo Spider 1998 1.7 1.8 T.Spark 16V 144 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km+3%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo Spider 2001 2.0 T.Spark 16V 150 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+4%
Alfa Romeo Spider 2002 2.0 T.Spark 16V 150 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Spider 1998 2.0 T.Spark 16V 155 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km0%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo Spider 1998 3.0 V6 192 HP manual 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km+1%
Alfa Romeo Spider 2002 3.0 V6 24V 218 HP manual 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.