Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi A3 2000 fuel consumption

Audi A3 from 2000 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 26% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 24% higher. Since 2000 the Audi A3 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been slightly above industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAudi A3All carmakersAudi A3
2000+4%+9% +5%+6%
Show all years
2001+5%+9% +6%+7%
2002+6%+9% +7%+5%
2003+6%+8% +8%+5%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi A3.

2000 - 2003

Audi A3 2000 8L hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.2 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+9%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines41.1 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+7%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Audi A3 2000 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.2 liters per 100 km or 18% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Audi A3 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.3 litres per 100 km or 18% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Audi A3 fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI 130 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi A3 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo 180 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Audi A3 2000 1.6 102 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+13%
Audi A3 2000 1.6 102 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+11%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V 125 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+4%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V 125 HP automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+2%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo 150 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+9%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo 150 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+22%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo Quattro 150 HP 4x4 manual 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km-2%
Audi A3 2002 1.8 5V Turbo 150 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+14%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo 180 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+14%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo 180 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km+17%
Audi A3 2000 1.8 5V Turbo Quattro 180 HP 4x4 manual 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+5%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI 90 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+8%
Audi A3 2001 1.9 TDI 100 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+12%
Audi A3 2001 1.9 TDI 100 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI 110 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+12%
Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI 130 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+2%
Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI 130 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+3%
Audi A3 2000 1.9 TDI Quattro 130 HP 4x4 manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+3%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.