Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi A4 2008 fuel consumption

Audi A4 from 2008 to 2011 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2008 Audi A4 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAudi A4All carmakersAudi A4
2008+12%+23% +13%+16%
Show all years
2009+14%+23% +14%+16%
2010+16%+23% +16%+16%
2011+19%+23% +19%+16%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi A4.

2008 - 2011

Audi A4 2008 Avant wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.6 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+23%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.4 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.3 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+16%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Audi A4 2008 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Audi A4 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Audi A4 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TFSI 211 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi A4 with 3.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi A4 2008 Avant 3.2 FSI quattro 265 HP 4x4).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+24%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+20%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TFSI 180 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+25%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TFSI 180 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km+26%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TFSI 211 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+29%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TFSI quattro 211 HP 4x4 manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+30%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TDI 120 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+23%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TDI 143 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+14%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.0 TDI 143 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+15%
2.7 liter diesel engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.7 TDI 190 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+16%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 2.7 TDI 190 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+18%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 3.0 TDI quattro 240 HP 4x4 manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+8%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 3.0 TDI quattro 240 HP 4x4 automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+18%
3.2 liter petrol engine
Audi A4 2008 Avant 3.2 FSI quattro 265 HP 4x4 manual 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+16%
Audi A4 2008 Avant 3.2 FSI quattro 265 HP 4x4 automatic 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+15%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.