Audi A6 2012 fuel consumption
Audi A6 from 2012 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 22% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 24% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Since 2012 the Audi A6 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Diesel cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Audi A6 | |||
2012 | +23% | +29% | ||
Show all years | ||||
2013 | +27% | +29% | ||
2014 | +30% | +29% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi A6.
2012 - 2014
Audi A6 2012 Allroad wagon fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.9 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +29% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Audi A6 2012 Allroad 3.0 TFSI quattro 300 HP 4x4 automatic | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
|
3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Audi A6 2012 Allroad 3.0 TDI quattro 204 HP 4x4 automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+26% |
Audi A6 2012 Allroad 3.0 TDI quattro 245 HP 4x4 automatic | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+30% |
Audi A6 2012 Allroad 3.0 TDI quattro 313 HP 4x4 automatic | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+30% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.