Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi A8 1999 fuel consumption

Audi A8 from 1999 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 12% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 15% higher. Starting from 1999 Audi A8 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2000 it was similar to average, at 2001 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAudi A8All carmakersAudi A8
1999+3%+5% +5%insignificant
Show all years
2000+4%+4% +5%insignificant
2001+5%+4% +6%insignificant
2002+6%+4% +7%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi A8.

1999 - 2002

Audi A8 1999 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines19.2 MPG
12.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.0 MPG
11.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines27.5 MPG
8.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Audi A8 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Audi A8 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Audi A8 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V Quattro 193 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi A8 with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V 193 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.5 liter diesel engine
Audi A8 1999 2.5 TDI 150 Hp 150 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Audi A8 1999 2.5 TDI 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+1%
Audi A8 1999 2.5 TDI Quattro 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP 4x4 automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+2%
Audi A8 2001 2.5 TDI 180 Hp 180 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Audi A8 2001 2.5 TDI 180 Hp Automatic 180 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km0%
Audi A8 2001 2.5 TDI Quattro 180 Hp Automatic 180 HP 4x4 automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km0%
2.8 liter petrol engine
Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V 193 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+4%
Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V Automatic 193 HP automatic 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km-1%
Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V Quattro 193 HP 4x4 manual 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+2%
Audi A8 1999 2.8 5V Quattro Automatic 193 HP 4x4 automatic 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km0%
3.3 liter diesel engine
Audi A8 2000 3.3 TDI Quattro 225 HP 4x4 automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+2%
3.7 liter petrol engine
Audi A8 1999 3.7 260 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km+9%
Audi A8 1999 3.7 Quattro 260 HP 4x4 automatic 19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km
17.6 MPG
13.4 l/100km+9%
4.2 liter petrol engine
Audi A8 1999 4.2 Quattro 310 HP 4x4 automatic 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
17.8 MPG
13.2 l/100km+2%
Audi A8 2000 4.2 Quattro Long 310 HP 4x4 automatic 18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
17.8 MPG
13.2 l/100km+2%
6.0 liter petrol engine
Audi A8 2001 6.0 Quattro 420 HP 4x4 automatic 16.1 MPG
14.6 l/100km
Audi A8 2001 6.0 Quattro Long 420 HP 4x4 automatic 16.1 MPG
14.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.