Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi TT 2010 fuel consumption

Audi TT from 2010 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 19% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2010 Audi TT average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2011 it was slightly above industry average, at 2013 difference became similar to average and finally at 2014 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAudi TTAll carmakersAudi TT
2010+16%+23% +16%+25%
Show all years
2011+19%+23% +19%+25%
2012+21%+23% +23%+25%
2013+23%+23% +27%+25%
2014+26%+23% +30%+25%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi TT.

2010 - 2014

Audi TT 2010 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.6 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines34.3 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+27%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Audi TT 2010 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Audi TT with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 15% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Audi TT fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi TT with 1.8 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Audi TT 2010 Coupe 1.8 TFSI 160 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 1.8 TFSI 160 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+19%
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 1.8 TFSI 160 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+16%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TFSI 211 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+23%
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TFSI 211 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+27%
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TFSI quattro 211 HP 4x4 automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+25%
Audi TT 2010 S Coupe 2.0 TFSI quattro 272 HP 4x4 automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+39%
Audi TT 2010 S Coupe 2.0 TFSI quattro 272 HP 4x4 manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+20%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4 manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+9%
Audi TT 2010 Coupe 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4 automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+44%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 RS Coupe 2.5 TFSI quattro 340 HP 4x4 manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+20%
Audi TT 2010 RS Coupe 2.5 TFSI quattro 340 HP 4x4 automatic 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
17.8 MPG
13.2 l/100km+55%
2010 - 2014

Audi TT 2010 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+18%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines42.4 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines34.3 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+23%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Audi TT 2010 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Audi TT with automatic transmission consumes around 1 litres per 100 km or 14% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Audi TT fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi TT with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi TT 2010 Roadster 1.8 TFSI 160 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 1.8 TFSI 160 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+17%
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 1.8 TFSI 160 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+12%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TFSI 211 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+21%
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TFSI 211 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+25%
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TFSI quattro 211 HP 4x4 automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+22%
Audi TT 2010 S Roadster 2.0 TFSI quattro 272 HP 4x4 manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+17%
Audi TT 2010 S Roadster 2.0 TFSI quattro 272 HP 4x4 automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+35%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4 manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+5%
Audi TT 2010 Roadster 2.0 TDI quattro 170 HP 4x4 automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+41%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Audi TT 2010 RS Roadster 2.5 TFSI quattro 360 HP 4x4 manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+6%
Audi TT 2010 RS Roadster 2.5 TFSI quattro 360 HP 4x4 automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.