Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW 1 series 2015 fuel consumption

BMW 1 series from 2015 to 2017 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2015 BMW 1 series average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2016 it was slightly above industry average, at 2017 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersBMW 1 series
2015+27%+33%
Show all years
2016+28%+31%
2017+28%+31%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW 1 series.

2015 - 2017

BMW 1 series 2015 F20 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.0 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.5 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+31%
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines41.1 MPG
5.7 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW 1 series 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW 1 series with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the BMW 1 series fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (BMW 118d 150 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 1 series with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW 125i 218 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
BMW 116i 109 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
BMW 118i 136 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
BMW 118i 136 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
1.5 liter diesel engine
BMW 116d 116 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
BMW 116d 116 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
BMW 116d 116 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
BMW 118i 136 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+36%
BMW 120i 177 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+46%
BMW 120i 177 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 120i 184 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
BMW 120i 184 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
BMW 125i 218 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
BMW 125i 218 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
BMW 125i 224 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 118d 150 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
BMW 118d 150 HP 4x4 manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
BMW 118d 150 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
BMW 120d 190 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
BMW 120d 190 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
BMW 120d 190 HP 4x4 automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
BMW 125d 224 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW M 135i xDrive 326 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+29%
BMW M135i 326 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+20%
BMW M135i 326 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+35%
BMW M140i 340 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+22%
BMW M140i 340 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+34%
BMW M140i 340 HP 4x4 automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+28%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.