Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW 5 series 2016 fuel consumption

BMW 5 series from 2016 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2016 the BMW 5 series average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersBMW 5 seriesAll carmakersBMW 5 series
2016+28%+40% +36%+40%
Show all years
2017+28%+39% +38%+40%
2018+28%+39% +39%+40%
2019+27%+40% +37%+40%
2020+27%+40% +36%+38%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW 5 series.

2016 - 2020

BMW 5 series 2016 G31 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines35.9 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.6 MPG
8.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+43%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.9 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+44%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW 5 series 2016 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW 5 series with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the BMW 5 series advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (BMW 520d Touring 190 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 5 series with 3.0 diesel engine and automatic transmission (BMW 530d Touring 265 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 520i 184 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
BMW 530i Touring 252 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+50%
BMW 530i 252 HP 4x4 automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 520d Touring 190 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+29%
BMW 520d Touring 190 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+56%
BMW 520d 190 HP 4x4 automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
BMW 520d 190 HP 4x4 automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
BMW 525d 231 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 540i Touring xDrive 340 HP 4x4 automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+36%
3.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 530d Touring 265 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+45%
BMW 530d Touring xDrive 265 HP 4x4 automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+47%
BMW 540d 320 HP 4x4 automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
BMW M550d 400 HP 4x4 automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
2016 - 2020

BMW 5 series 2016 G30 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+38%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.4 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+36%

According to advertised fuel consumption, BMW 5 series 2016 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW 5 series with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 10% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the BMW 5 series advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (BMW 520d 190 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 5 series with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW 540i 340 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 520i 184 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
BMW 530i 252 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+47%
BMW 530i xDrive 252 HP 4x4 automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+36%
2.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 520d 190 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+29%
BMW 520d 190 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+42%
BMW 520d xDrive 190 HP 4x4 automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+41%
BMW 525d 231 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 540i 340 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+36%
BMW 540i xDrive 340 HP 4x4 automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+36%
3.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 530d xDrive 249 HP 4x4 automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
BMW 530d 265 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+51%
BMW 530d xDrive 265 HP 4x4 automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+19%
BMW 540d 320 HP 4x4 automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
BMW M550d 400 HP 4x4 automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
4.4 liter petrol engine
BMW M550i 462 HP 4x4 automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km+31%
BMW M550i 530 HP 4x4 automatic 19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.