Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW 7 series 1994 fuel consumption

BMW 7 series from 1994 to 1998 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 17% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 1994 BMW 7 series average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 1997 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersBMW 7 seriesAll carmakersBMW 7 series
1994+6%+15% +3%-
Show all years
1995+5%+15% +2%-
1996+4%+11% +2%+8%
1997+3%-+3%+8%
1998+3%-+4%+8%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW 7 series.

1994 - 1998

BMW 7 series 1994 E38 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines19.0 MPG
12.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+4%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+8%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW 7 series 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 7% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW 7 series with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the BMW 7 series fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW 728i 193 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 7 series with 5.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW 750iL 326 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.5 liter diesel engine
BMW 725tds 143 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
BMW 725tds 143 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+8%
2.8 liter petrol engine
BMW 728i 193 HP manual 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km+5%
BMW 728i 193 HP automatic 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km0%
BMW 728iL 193 HP automatic 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km0%
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 730i 218 HP manual 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+16%
BMW 730i 218 HP automatic 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+28%
BMW 730iL 218 HP manual 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+16%
BMW 730iL 218 HP automatic 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+28%
3.5 liter petrol engine
BMW 735i 235 HP manual 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
BMW 735i 235 HP automatic 18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km-2%
BMW 735iL 235 HP automatic 18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km-2%
4.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 740i 286 HP manual 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
18.5 MPG
12.7 l/100km+6%
BMW 740i 286 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+7%
BMW 740iL 286 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km+7%
4.4 liter petrol engine
BMW 740i 286 HP manual 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km+1%
BMW 740i 286 HP automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
BMW 740iL 286 HP automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
5.4 liter petrol engine
BMW 750i 326 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km+17%
BMW 750iL 326 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km+17%
BMW 750i 326 HP automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
16.9 MPG
13.9 l/100km-1%
BMW 750iL 326 HP automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
16.9 MPG
13.9 l/100km-1%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.