Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW Z4 2006 fuel consumption

BMW Z4 from 2006 to 2009 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2006 the BMW Z4 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersBMW Z4
2006+9%+6%
Show all years
2007+11%+6%
2008+12%+6%
2009+14%+8%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW Z4.

2006 - 2009

BMW Z4 2006 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.5 MPG
10.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+3%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW Z4 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW Z4 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW Z4 2006 Coupe 3.0si 265 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 Coupe 3.0si 265 HP manual 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+9%
BMW Z4 2006 Coupe 3.0si 265 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+9%
BMW Z4 2006 3.0 M coupe 343 HP manual 19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km-2%
3.2 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 M 3.2 343 HP manual 19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km-2%
2006 - 2009

BMW Z4 2006 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.6 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW Z4 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW Z4 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the BMW Z4 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.0i 150 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW Z4 with 2.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.5i 177 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.0i 150 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+1%
2.5 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.5i 177 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+6%
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.5i 177 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+7%
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.5si 218 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+13%
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 2.5si 218 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+20%
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 3.0si 265 HP manual 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+9%
BMW Z4 2006 Roadster 3.0si 265 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+9%
3.2 liter petrol engine
BMW Z4 2006 M 3.2 343 HP manual 19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km
18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km+7%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.