Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chevrolet Cruze 2015 fuel consumption

Chevrolet Cruze from 2015 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 21% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 25% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Since 2015 the Chevrolet Cruze average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersChevrolet Cruze
2015+27%+7%
Show all years
2016+28%+7%
2017+28%+7%
2018+28%+7%
2019+27%+7%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Cruze.

2015 - 2019

Chevrolet Cruze 2015 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chevrolet Cruze 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Chevrolet Cruze with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Chevrolet Cruze 2015 1.4 155 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+7%
Chevrolet Cruze 2015 1.4 155 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+7%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.