Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chevrolet Malibu 2011 fuel consumption

Chevrolet Malibu from 2011 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 29% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2011 the Chevrolet Malibu average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersChevrolet Malibu
2011+19%+29%
Show all years
2012+21%+29%
2013+23%+29%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Malibu.

2011 - 2013

Chevrolet Malibu 2011 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+29%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chevrolet Malibu 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Chevrolet Malibu advertised fuel economy is one of the best, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.4 liter petrol engine
Chevrolet Malibu 2011 2.4 167 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Chevrolet Malibu 2011 2.4 167 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+29%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.