Chevrolet Spark 2005 fuel consumption
Chevrolet Spark from 2005 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2005 Chevrolet Spark average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2006 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Spark | |||
| 2005 | +8% | +14% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2006 | +9% | +14% | ||
| 2007 | +11% | +14% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Spark.
2005 - 2007
Chevrolet Spark 2005 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 39.0 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +14% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chevrolet Spark 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Spark 2005 0.8 AT 51 HP automatic | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Chevrolet Spark 2005 0.8 MT 51 HP manual | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+14% |
| 1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Spark 2005 1.0 MT 63 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.