Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 fuel consumption
Chrysler Grand Voyager from 2008 to 2011 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 7% higher. Since 2008 the Chrysler Grand Voyager average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chrysler Grand Voyager | |||
| 2008 | +13% | +5% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2009 | +14% | +5% | ||
| 2010 | +16% | +5% | ||
| 2011 | +19% | +5% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chrysler Grand Voyager.
2008 - 2011
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 18.5 MPG 12.7 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +5% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 2.8 CRD 163 HP automatic | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+5% |
| 3.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 3.8 193 HP automatic | 18.5 MPG 12.7 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.