Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chrysler Sebring 2000 fuel consumption

Chrysler Sebring from 2000 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2000 the Chrysler Sebring average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersChrysler Sebring
2000+4%insignificant
Show all years
2001+5%insignificant
2002+6%insignificant
2003+6%insignificant
2004+7%insignificant
2005+8%insignificant
2006+9%insignificant
2007+11%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chrysler Sebring.

2000 - 2007

Chrysler Sebring 2000 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chrysler Sebring 2000 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Chrysler Sebring with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Chrysler Sebring 2000 Coupe 3.0 V6 24V 203 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.4 liter petrol engine
Chrysler Sebring 2001 Coupe 2.4 i 16V 147 HP manual 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Chrysler Sebring 2001 Coupe 2.4 i 16V 147 HP automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
3.0 liter petrol engine
Chrysler Sebring 2000 Coupe 3.0 V6 24V 203 HP manual 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Chrysler Sebring 2000 Coupe 3.0 V6 24V 203 HP automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km-1%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.