Fiat Punto 2012 fuel consumption
Fiat Punto from 2012 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 14% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 22% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 6% higher. Since 2012 the Fiat Punto average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Fiat Punto | |||
| 2012 | +21% | +40% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2013 | +23% | +40% | ||
| 2014 | +26% | +40% | ||
| 2015 | +27% | +40% | ||
| 2016 | +28% | +40% | ||
| 2017 | +28% | +40% | ||
| 2018 | +28% | +40% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Punto.
2012 - 2018
Fiat Punto 2012 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 47.8 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 38.4 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +46% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 61.1 MPG 3.9 l/100km |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 0.9 85 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+40% |
| Fiat Punto 2014 0.9 TwinAir 105 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
|
| 1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 69 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+29% |
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 85 HP manual | 67.2 MPG 3.5 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+69% |
| 1.2 liter diesel engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 Multijet 85 Hp 85 HP manual | 67.2 MPG 3.5 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 Multijet 95 Hp 95 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 77 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 8V 78 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 MultiAir 105 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 T-jet MultiAir 135 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
2012 - 2018
Fiat Punto 2012 3 doors fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 46.2 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 37.6 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +35% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 61.1 MPG 3.9 l/100km |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 0.9 85 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+40% |
| Fiat Punto 2014 0.9 TwinAir 105 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
|
| 1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 69 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+29% |
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 85 HP manual | 67.2 MPG 3.5 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+69% |
| 1.2 liter diesel engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 Multijet 85 Hp 85 HP manual | 67.2 MPG 3.5 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.2 1.3 Multijet 95 Hp 95 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 70 Hp 70 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+3% |
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 77 Hp 77 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 8V 78 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 MultiAir 105 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Fiat Punto 2012 1.4 T-jet MultiAir 135 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.